Anonymous questionnaire
Student feedback
At the end of every edition, students fill in an anonymous questionnaire about the course. Here is what they told us — as aggregates, so that no score can be traced back to anyone.
01 · At a glance
The 2025/2026 edition in numbers
Questionnaires
12
anonymous · a.y. 2025/2026
Overall difficulty
6.9/ 10
mean · 1 easy → 10 hard
Lab usefulness
6.5/ 10
mean · 1 not useful → 10 very useful
Slides & bibliography
12of 12
chose “quite” or “very adequate”
02 · Theory & materials
How hard is it, really?
Two questions on difficulty, one on the slides and the bibliography.
Overall difficulty
Globally, on a scale from 1 to 10 what is the level of difficulty experienced in learning the concepts illustrated in the course?
1 = easy10 = hard
- n
- 12
- mean
- 6.9
Number of students per score.
| Score | Students |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 7 | 3 |
| 8 | 6 |
| 9 | 1 |
Hilbert space & Dirac formalism
On a scale from 1 to 10 what is the level of difficulty experienced in learning the Hilbert vector space and the Dirac formalism?
1 = easy10 = hard
- n
- 12
- mean
- 5.8
Number of students per score.
| Score | Students |
|---|---|
| 1 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 |
| 5 | 1 |
| 6 | 1 |
| 7 | 3 |
| 8 | 2 |
| 9 | 1 |
Slides & bibliography
Did you find the slides and the bibliography adequate?
- Not at all0 · 0%
- Not much0 · 0%
- Quite adequate6 · 50%
- Very adequate6 · 50%
Share of the 12 respondents.
03 · Quantum Software Laboratory
The lab, seen by the students
Which lab topics caught their interest, how much the sessions helped with the theory, and how steep Julia felt.
Most interesting lab topics
Which one of the laboratory topics did you find interesting?
- Python programming and quantum simulation with Qiskit10 · 83%
- Quantum circuits, simulators and quantum computers theory9 · 75%
- Julia programming and quantum simulation with QuantumSavory8 · 67%
- Testing on IBM-Q computers5 · 42%
Multiple answers allowed — 32 selections in all, about 2.7 per student. Percentages are of the 12 respondents and do not add up to 100%.
Usefulness of the lab sessions
On a scale from 1 to 10, how useful were the laboratory sessions to clarify the concepts seen in theory classes?
1 = not useful10 = very useful
- n
- 12
- mean
- 6.5
Number of students per score.
| Score | Students |
|---|---|
| 3 | 2 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 |
| 6 | 1 |
| 7 | 4 |
| 9 | 1 |
| 10 | 2 |
Learning Julia & QuantumSavory
On a scale from 1 to 10, how would you rate the difficulty of learning Julia and QuantumSavory?
1 = easy10 = hard
- n
- 12
- mean
- 5.8
Number of students per score.
| Score | Students |
|---|---|
| 2 | 1 |
| 3 | 1 |
| 4 | 1 |
| 5 | 1 |
| 6 | 3 |
| 7 | 3 |
| 8 | 2 |
04 · Open answers
In their words
Suggestions for improvement
Was there anything else about this course we could improve?
1 of 12 students answered the open question. The answer is reproduced word for word.
Include small sample tests on exam questions and show examples of projects from past years
Have a suggestion already?
Write to us